Florida State University Indirect Cost Rate Agreement – What You Need to Know
Florida State University (FSU) is one of the premier research universities in the United States. The university’s research programs receive significant funding from external sources such as federal agencies, private foundations, and corporations. To ensure that these research programs are adequately funded, FSU negotiates an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (ICRA) with the federal government.
What is an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement?
An ICRA is an agreement between a university or organization and the federal government that establishes the percentage of indirect costs that can be charged to a grant or contract. Indirect costs are expenses that support the research process but cannot be directly attributed to a specific project. These expenses include administrative costs, facilities expenses, and other overhead costs.
Why is the ICRA Important?
The ICRA is important because it determines the amount of indirect costs that can be charged to a grant or contract. In other words, the ICRA is a crucial factor in determining how much funding a research program will receive. The federal government negotiates ICRA agreements with universities and other organizations to ensure that indirect costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable.
FSU’s ICRA
FSU’s current ICRA was negotiated in 2016 and is valid until 2021. The agreement establishes a predetermined overhead rate (POR) of 56.0% for all research programs. This means that for every dollar of direct costs charged to a grant or contract, FSU can charge an additional 56 cents to cover indirect costs.
The ICRA is applied to all federally funded research projects at FSU, including grants from the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of Defense, among others.
How Does the ICRA Affect Researchers?
For researchers at FSU, the ICRA has both positive and negative impacts. On the positive side, the ICRA provides funding for indirect costs that are essential to support research activities. These costs include maintaining research facilities, managing research projects, and complying with federal regulations.
On the negative side, the ICRA limits the amount of funding available for direct research costs. Direct costs include research materials, equipment, and salaries for research personnel. Because indirect costs are factored into the funding equation, researchers must carefully manage their budgets to ensure that they have adequate funding for direct costs.
Conclusion
The ICRA is a critical agreement that affects the funding of research programs at Florida State University. The agreement provides funding for indirect costs that are essential to support research activities but also limits the amount of funding available for direct research costs. For researchers at FSU, it is essential to understand the impact of the ICRA on their research budgets to ensure the best possible outcomes for their research programs.
Recent Comments